<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PostGIS 2.0.0 released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://strk.keybit.net/blog/2012/04/04/postgis-2-0-0-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://strk.keybit.net/blog/2012/04/04/postgis-2-0-0-released/</link>
	<description>Free Thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 17:21:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: strk</title>
		<link>http://strk.keybit.net/blog/2012/04/04/postgis-2-0-0-released/comment-page-1/#comment-28093</link>
		<dc:creator>strk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 17:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strk.keybit.net/blog/?p=341#comment-28093</guid>
		<description>That schema will contain all the topology functions and the metadata tables for built topologies.
Giving ownership to the database owner would give her all the privileges required to _use_ the topology (and more).

I think only EXECUTE  on all schema functions and INSERT on topology.topology and topology.layer would be needed for a strict minimum (but hadn&#039;t tried)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That schema will contain all the topology functions and the metadata tables for built topologies.<br />
Giving ownership to the database owner would give her all the privileges required to _use_ the topology (and more).</p>
<p>I think only EXECUTE  on all schema functions and INSERT on topology.topology and topology.layer would be needed for a strict minimum (but hadn&#8217;t tried)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://strk.keybit.net/blog/2012/04/04/postgis-2-0-0-released/comment-page-1/#comment-28089</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strk.keybit.net/blog/?p=341#comment-28089</guid>
		<description>When PostGIS 2 is enabled for a user, it creates a Topology schema under the users database. Should the database owner be given ownership of the Topology schema?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When PostGIS 2 is enabled for a user, it creates a Topology schema under the users database. Should the database owner be given ownership of the Topology schema?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
